Pronkin Sergei Vladimirovich
-
Mechanisms for “cancelling” the heir of the Russian monarch: first quarter of the 18th — first quarter of the 19th centuriesLomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21 2026. Vol. 23. N 1. p.158-175read more51
-
The concept of “cancel culture” in politics can be used to denote the mechanisms used in political communication to deprive one or another political actor of the opportunity to use state power to achieve their own goals. As an act of communication, “cancel culture” is in a complex relationship with the activity of physical elimination of political actors or repressive policies. The objective of this article is to identify in the history of the Russian state in the 18th–19th centuries the mechanisms of “cancellation” of the heir to the throne, used to replace one heir with another or to change the principles of succession; to identify typologically close elements in the application of these mechanisms. The result of the study was the identification of one common feature of the two “cancellation” processes — an extremely significant role played by the personal qualities of the heir to the throne. The identified specific features of each of the cases of cancellation consisted in the fact that in the first quarter of the 18th century the mechanism of demonstrative cancellation was used, and in the first quarter of the 19th century — hidden cancellation.
Keywords: history of Russia, political culture, political struggle, culture of abolition Peter I, Alexei Petrovich, Alexander I, Nicholas I, Konstantin Pavlovich
-
-
The Devolution of Wales: Administrative AspectLomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21 2021. N 2. p.38-52read more1239
-
The article is devoted to the Wales’s devolution process. The author comments well-known statement that devolution is a “process, not event”. He traces its main stages — administrative and two legislative. The author based mainly on official documents — laws and related “command” documents. Attention is drawn to British tradition of independent commissions. The work of the Richard, Holtham and Silk’s commissions analyzed. Indicated that the rights of Wales are less than those in Northern Ireland and Scotland. Wales is more integrated with England, in legal terms it was a single space “England and Wales”. Therefore, devolution’s support was here initially low. In the 1997 referendum, it was supported by only 50,3% of those who voted, with a turnout of 51%. Consequently, the idea’s support was by only a quarter of the inhabitants. However, the support is gradually expanding. This is the basis of the gradual expansion of the region’s rights. The devolution’s consequences are contradictory. Does it strengthen the kingdom, as its initiators believed, or lead to its collapse?
Keywords: devolution, Wales, National Assembly for Wales, Senedd Cymru, Welsh Parliament, Richard Commission, Holtham Commission, Silk Commission, Regionalization
-


