Dmitry Vladimirovich Demin
-
On the question of the causes of the " color revolutions»: a look from Russia and abroadLomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21 2020. 4. p.66-81read more888
-
Despite the substantial number of studies devoted to color revolutions, there is no common approach to understanding this geopolitical phenomenon in the modern scientific discourse. Interpretations of the essence of color revolutions can di er dramatically: from a spontaneous uprising of the masses to the use of special technology by the United States to overthrow political regimes. For the first time in Russian historiography this article presents a systematic analysis of various theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of color revolutions. The key issue is the ratio of endogenous and exogenous factors that led to the color revolutions. The scientific works of leading domestic and foreign experts on this problem are considered. The authors come to the conclusion that applied research of color revolutions in the works of both foreign and domestic scientists is carried out from different positions. Discourse about the endogenous origins of color revolutions prevails in the Western scientific world, while many Russian researchers consider external in uences to be their primary cause. According to the author’s concept, it was external factors that played a key role in the origin of the color revolutions, because it was the technologies of the so power of the United States and its allies that became the key reasons and, at the same time, tools for carrying out these operations to dismantle political regimes in the beginning of the XXI century.
Keywords: Color revolution; Soft power; Hybrid war; Non-violent struggle; Bulldozer revolution; Rose revolution; Orange revolution; Tulip revolution; Arab Spring
-
-
On the issue of nonviolence of the "Color revolutions" of the first waveLomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21 2022. 1. p.96-116read more619
-
The "color revolutions" of the first wave traditionally include the "bulldozer revolution" in Serbia (2000), the "rose revolution" in Georgia (2003), the "orange revolution" in Ukraine (2004) and the "tulip revolution" in Kyrgyzstan (2005). The purpose of this article is to consider the "color revolutions" of the first wave from the point of view of nonviolence. The author analyzes some of the works of the ideologist of the "color revolutions" J. Sharpe, who developed the conceptual basis of nonviolent resistance, and concludes that some of the methods of nonviolent struggle he developed are not actually nonviolent. On the basis of documents from the Foreign Policy Archive of the Russian Federation, many of which are published for the first time, and materials from leading media, an attempt has been made to answer the question whether violence in general was not used during the implementation of the "color revolutions" of the first wave, or whether nonviolence was a deliberately created illusion, and the concepts of nonviolent resistance developed by political technologists are not associated with a conscious rejection of violence in all its manifestations. As a result, the author concludes that despite the interest of the organizers in the bloodlessness of the "color revolutions", it is impossible to recognize them as nonviolent.Keywords: nonviolence; nonviolent resistance; "сolor revolutions"; "bulldozer revolution"; "rose revolution"; "orange revolution"; "tulip revolution"; J. Sharp
-
-
Russian policy towards the “rose revolution” in GeorgiaLomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21 2023. 2. p.85-103read more740
-
The article is devoted to the study of Russia’s policy towards the Rose revolution, which took place in November 2003 in Georgia. It became the first color revolution in the post-Soviet space, during which a complex of technologies for changing political regimes, tested in Serbia three years earlier, again demonstrated its eff ectiveness. Despite the fact that many aspects of this color revolution have received decent coverage in the scientifi c literature to date, the position and policy of the Russian state in relation to this coup d’etat still remain virtually unexplored. The article provides an overview of Russian-Georgian relations in the post-Soviet period, analyzes the reaction of the Russian authorities to the parliamentary elections held on November 2, 2003 in Georgia, evaluates and systematizes the statements and concrete steps of Russian politicians and diplomats during the implementation of the Rose revolution. The authors used documents from the Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation, many of which are being introduced into scientifi c circulation for the fi rst time, electronic resources of Russian state authorities, materials from leading Russian and foreign media. It is concluded that in order to preserve political stability in Georgia, Moscow took a neutral position and even contributed to the settlement of the internal crisis in the country, but as a result of the color revolution anti-Russian forces came to power in Tbilisi, whose policy subsequently led to a signifi cant deterioration of Russian-Georgian relations and to an aggravation of the situation in the South Caucasus region as a whole.
Keywords: Color revolutions; Rose revolution; Georgia; post-Soviet space; Russian-Georgian relations; Shevardnadze; Saakashvili; Burjanadze; Abashidze
-