On the question of the causes of the " color revolutions»: a look from Russia and abroad
Abstract
Despite the substantial number of studies devoted to color revolutions, there is no common approach to understanding this geopolitical phenomenon in the modern scientific discourse. Interpretations of the essence of color revolutions can di er dramatically: from a spontaneous uprising of the masses to the use of special technology by the United States to overthrow political regimes. For the first time in Russian historiography this article presents a systematic analysis of various theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of color revolutions. The key issue is the ratio of endogenous and exogenous factors that led to the color revolutions. The scientific works of leading domestic and foreign experts on this problem are considered. The authors come to the conclusion that applied research of color revolutions in the works of both foreign and domestic scientists is carried out from different positions. Discourse about the endogenous origins of color revolutions prevails in the Western scientific world, while many Russian researchers consider external in uences to be their primary cause. According to the author’s concept, it was external factors that played a key role in the origin of the color revolutions, because it was the technologies of the so power of the United States and its allies that became the key reasons and, at the same time, tools for carrying out these operations to dismantle political regimes in the beginning of the XXI century.
References
Beissinger M. Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Discusion of the Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions // Perspectives on Politics. 2007. Vol. 5 (2). Р. 259–276.
Brzezinski Z. The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership. NY.: Basic Books, 2009. 256 p.
Bunce V., Wolchik S. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 373 p.
Engdahl F.W. Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order. Boxboro: ird Millennium Press, 2009. 268 p.
Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 2011. 368 p.
Kandelaki G. Georgia’s Rose Revolution: A Participant’s Perspective // United States Institute of Peace. Special report 167. 2006. URL: https://www.usip.org/ sites/default/ les/sr167.pdf (дата обращения 25.08.2020).
Kissinger H. Does America Need A Foreign Policy?: Toward A Diplomacy For e 21st Century. Darby: Diane Pub Co, 2004. 318 p.
Lane D. “Coloured Revolution” as a Political Phenomenon // Rethinking the “Coloured Revolution” / ed. by Lane D., White S. NY.: Routledge, 2010. P. 1–23.Mitchell L. e Color Revolutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. 256 p.
White S. Is There a Pattern? // Rethinking the “Coloured Revolution” / ed. by Lane D., White S. NY.: Routledge, 2010. P. 284–300.
Received: 12/30/2020
Accepted: 01/30/2021
Accepted date: 04/25/2021
Keywords: Color revolution; Soft power; Hybrid war; Non-violent struggle; Bulldozer revolution; Rose revolution; Orange revolution; Tulip revolution; Arab Spring
Available in the on-line version with: 20.04.2021
-
To cite this article: