ISSN 2073-2643
En Ru
ISSN 2073-2643
The crisis of institutional trust as a symptom of a deeply divided community (the example of the United States)

The crisis of institutional trust as a symptom of a deeply divided community (the example of the United States)

Abstract

The current study, based on a qualitative analysis of sociological and statistical data, tries to evaluate the scale of the crisis of institutional trust in modern American society, as well as scientific validity and heuristic value of applying the theoretical model of a “deeply divided society” to characterize the modern situation in the United States of America. The “deeply divided society” model, with rare exceptions, had been usually applied to countries and regions experiencing an early stage of nation-building and establishing of the democratic institutions after the end of the civil war, liberation from colonial dependence, political dictatorship or apartheid. The model is rarely applied to developed democracies, such as the United States, with the exception of specific regions or historical periods of their development (Southern states at the time of racial segregation), which testifies in favor of the scientific novelty of the presented study. It also highlights the key directions of academic discussion on the topic and indicates the problems embedded in a number of theoretical and empirical models, as well as clarifies the key terms. It also tries to put these and other related issues in perspective, both domestic and international.

References

Americans’ Trust in Mass Media Sinks to New Low // Gallup, 2016. URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx

Autonomy, self-governance, and conflict resolution: Innovative approaches to institutional design in divided societies / Ed. by Wol S., Weller M. NY.: Routledge, 2006.

Black D. On the Rationale of Group Decision-making // Journal of Political Economy. 1948. 56. Р. 23–34.

Downs A. An Economic eory of Democracy. Harper and Row; 1st edition, 1957.

Du Toit P. Bargaining About Bargaining: Inducing the Self-negating Prediction in Deeply Divided Societies–the Case of South Africa // The Journal of Con ict Resolution. 33 (2). Sage Publications, Inc.: 1989.

Fourth Annual Report On U.S. Attitudes Toward Socialism // The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, October 30, 2019. URL: https://www. victimsofcommunism.org/2019-annual-report

Guelke A. Politics in deeply divided societies. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.

Haass R. Foreign Policy By Example. Crisis at Home Makes the United States Vulnerable Abroad // Foreign A airs, June 5, 2020.

Holcombe R.G. Public Sector Economics: The Role of Government in the American Economy. Pearson Education, 2006.

Horowitz D.L. A democratic South Africa? Constitutional engineering in a divided society. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California press, 1991.

In Changing U.S. Electorate, Race and Education Remain Stark Dividing Lines // Pew Research Center, JUNE 2, 2020 URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/06/02/in-changing-u-s-electorate-race-and-education-remain- stark-dividing-lines/

Krasa S., Polborn Mattias K. Political Competition in Legislative Elections Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 August 2018. URL: https:// www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/political-competition-in-legislative-elections/33F501778E779F9ED692DEBD 42B3632F

Lerner H. Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Luskin R.C., O’Flynn I., Fishkin J.S., Russell D. Deliberating across deep divides // Political studies. Guildford. 2014. Vol. 62. Iss. 1. P. 116–135.

Lustick I. Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism Versus Control // World Politics 31 (3). Cambridge University Press, 1979. 325 p.

Muro M., Whiton J. America has two economies — and they’re diverging fast // Brookings Inst., September 19, 2019. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2019/09/10/america-has-two-economies-and-theyre-diverging-fast/

McCulloch A. Power-sharing and political stability in deeply divided societies. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2014.

McGarry J. Northern Ireland and the divided world — Post Agreement Northern Ireland in a comparative perspective. Oxford University Press, 2001.

McGarry J., O’Leary B. Iraq constitution of 2005: Liberal consociation as political prescription // International journal of constitutional law. Oxford, 2007. Vol. 5. N 4. P. 670–698.

Nordlinger E. Conflict Regulation in Deeply Divided Societies. Harvard University, 1972.

Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016 // Pew Research Center, JUNE 22, 2016 URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/

Political Polarization In The American Public // Pew Research Center, JUNE 12, 2014. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2014/06/12/section-3-political-polarization-and-personal-life/

Selway J., Templeman Kh. The myth of consociationalism? Conflict reduction in divided societies // Comparative political studies. ousand Oaks, CA, 2012. N 45 (12). P. 1542–1571.

Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars / Ed. by Roeder Ph.G., Rothchild D. Ithaca: Cornel Univ. press, 2005.

Treverton G.F., Treverton K. Is California nearing its ‘Boston tea party moment’? // The Hill, May 03, 2020. URL: https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/495848-is-california-nearing-its-boston-tea-party-moment

U.S. National Pride Falls to Record Low // Gallup, June 15, 2020. URL: https://news.gallup.com/poll/312644/national-pride-falls-record-low.aspx

Zitner A. Chinni D. Democrats and Republicans Live in Different Worlds // e Wall Street Journal, Sep. 20, 2019.

PDF, ru

Received: 12/30/2020

Accepted: 01/30/2021

Accepted date: 04/25/2021

Keywords: public trust; crisis; deeply divided society; voters’ preferences; protest movement; separatism; civil war; foreign influence; global leadership

Available in the on-line version with: 20.04.2021

  • To cite this article:
Issue 4, 2020