Articles

The article reveals the evolution of planning activities in the Soviet Union during the years of Soviet power and in Russia during the transition to market relations. The study used a historical approach, methods of induction and deduction, content analysis, and expert assessments. The distinctive features of the first, second, and third pre-war five-year plans, and the specific features of the mobilization economy during the Great Patriotic War are summarized. The main tasks of the fourth, fifth, sixth post-war five-year plans and the seven-year plan of 1959-1965, as well as the achievements and difficulties of this period of socialist construction, are highlighted. The reasons for abandoning the directive nature of planning and switching to indicative planning in the 1980s, as well as for developing plans for economic and social development of the USSR in the early 1990s are analyzed. The timeliness of the transition from command-administrative to market forms of management is substantiated. The results of application of methods and instruments of directive and indicative planning, mechanisms of administrative-economic and economic regulation at various stages of functioning of the national economy of the country are illustrated. The factors of transformation of the Russian economy in the post-Soviet period are shown. The need for activation of activities on strategic management and planning in the post-Soviet economic space is revealed. The advantages of development of strategic documents at the subnational level are established. Recommendations on dissemination of methodological bases and practice of strategizing in territorial and sectoral sections are formulated.

The 1993 election was the first time that money became a significant factor in an election campaign. Today, issues related to the transparency of financing, political corruption, and uneven access to resources remain relevant. Although the "constituent elections" have received attention fr om researchers, issues surrounding public and private funding for political campaigns have not been adequately addressed. This article aims to identify flaws in the current electoral system regarding financial regulations, as well as answer the question of how money contributes to the success of certain political organizations. Understanding these factors can help us better understand the imbalances in the Russian party system. To conduct this research, we will use methods from historical, political, and legal disciplines, as well as basic mathematical operations. In a difficult socio-economic situation, the government, which had declared a policy of holding multiparty elections, faced challenges in subsidizing these organizations. As a result, these organizations had to find sponsors independently. The election campaign was held in a context wh ere government agencies were shown to be lenient towards violations, including financial ones related to the election process. Further legislation aimed to address these shortcomings and strengthen oversight over election funds. However, abuse during the 1996 presidential election undermined these efforts. Overall, the 1993 election experience showed that while money is an important factor in elections, it is not the only one. Financial resources can serve as an effective tool to promote promising organizations with an authentic electoral profile.

This paper investigates the pivotal role of integrated territorial development (ITD) in ensuring regional economic security. The study’s relevance stems from the need to reassess traditional approaches to territorial development in the face of contemporary challenges. The methodology is based on a systems-based, institutional, and spatial approach, employing both general scientific and specialized methods. The primary focus is on analyzing the interrelationship between the social and environmental aspects of ITD and their impact on the sustainability of regional economic systems. The research identifies new opportunities associated with digitalization, the “green” economy, and human capital development. Implementation mechanisms for ITD are examined, including financial instruments and institutional frameworks. The conclusion emphasizes the critical role of the state in ensuring economic security through ITD and the necessity of integrating the efforts of business and society.

Introduction. The sustainable development of the region in conditions of turbulence requires the development of adaptive mechanisms and appropriate tools to ensure it. The prospects for the implementation of the principles of sustainable development in Russia cannot be considered separately from the ongoing market reforms in the state. The transition to sustainable development of both the country as a whole and its individual regions should occur in close connection with a radical structural and technical and technological restructuring of social production based on accelerating the pace of scientific and technological progress, in particular, towards comprehensive greening not only of the basic sectors of the economy, but also of all spheres of human activity. The urgency of modernizing regional socio-economic and ecological systems is due to the formation of special conditions for economic growth in the regions, taking into account the processes of economic integration and the dominance of the theoretical foundations of the concept of sustainable development in most countries and regions of the world, and Russia is no exception. Research methods. The methodological basis of this work is the integrated use of a set of general scientific and special research methods. In particular, a systematic approach has made it possible to develop a theoretical model of regional development and the boundaries of the state's regulatory influence on it. The study of the problem of state regulation of regional development has become possible through the use of a number of other scientific methods, among which the retrospective method is widely used, in which the subject of research is analyzed in its sequential development, in the context of a specific historical situation and the factors influencing it at each stage. This trend has made it possible to identify the relationship between the past, present and future: the mechanisms and tools of state influence on regions that were used in the past have not lost their relevance and can be applied in modern conditions. Result. The study of the implementation of sustainable development policy in the regions of the Russian Federation under conditions of turbulence has been further developed, and the directions of transformation of economic relations against the background of regionalization processes in the socio-political sphere, economy and institutional environment of the regional space have been identified, which determines the appearance of certain effects that are important from the perspective of ensuring the sustainable development of the regions of the state. Conclusion. As a result of the analysis, ways are proposed to improve the organizational and economic factors of managing the sustainable development of regions in conditions of turbulence by: increasing the adaptability of regional potential based on innovative technologies, optimizing and ensuring flexibility of economic, organizational and administrative levers of influence on investment and innovation processes, and diversifying them through the introduction of "soft" adaptive ones.

In the context of increasing global and domestic competition for resources, territorial branding is becoming one of the key tools that helps attract resources for urban development. The relevance of the study is due to the accumulation of successful practices in the application of territorial branding of Russian cities, which require their generalization and theoretical understanding. The purpose of the study is to characterize the currently established theory of geobranding and the Russian practice of its application. The work uses the methods of scientometric and bibliographic analysis of publications, secondary statistical analysis. The main results of the study confirm the growing interest in territorial branding, which is reflected in the annual increase in the number of city brands in Russia, as well as the preservation of scientific publication activity on this topic for the period 2014-2024. The scientific novelty of the study lies in conducting a comprehensive bibliographic and scientometric analysis of Russian scientific publications on urban branding for the period 2014–2024 with ranking of cities – administrative capitals of Russia by their mentions in scientific publications on the topic of city branding, followed by a description of the context of research of the 10 most mentioned cities. The conclusions from the article can be used by local governments, business representatives in developing strategies for positioning and promoting city brands, as well as by the scientific community for future research on the topic of territorial branding. Further research involves bibliographic and scientometric analysis of foreign scientific literature on promising areas of studying urban branding practices, assessing their effectiveness and analyzing the impact on urban development in the long term.

Modern industry is undergoing rapid digital transformation, with artificial intelligence (AI) playing a key role. Automation of production processes, resource management, and predictive analytics based on AI contribute to increased efficiency and cost reduction for enterprises. However, the widespread adoption of intelligent technologies brings legal challenges that require effective state regulation. This article examines the key aspects of public-law regulation of AI in industry, including issues of cybersecurity, algorithm certification, liability for errors of autonomous systems, and international experience in this field. Special attention is given to the need to establish transparent mechanisms for control and oversight, as well as to develop a national AI regulation strategy that takes into account competitive challenges and national interests. The conclusions of the article emphasize the need for a balanced approach that combines support for technological innovations with effective legal regulation measures.

The second part of the article examines a number of methodological issues related to understanding the state. Among them are: the authors’ non-critical attitude to dogmatic ideas about the state, inconsistencies between the definition of the state and the presentation of its characteristics (features, elements). Particular attention is paid to state sovereignty as a quality that, on the one hand, is used to be unjustifiably associated by theorists with any doctrinal understanding of the state and with any historical eras, and on the other hand, actually belongs today to certain political entities that are not regarded as states formally.

The article considers the approaches formed by domestic legal doctrine to the definition of the concept of federal territories. It is proved that the understanding of federal territories exclusively as public-law entities does not fully reflect their multifaceted legal nature. It is substantiated that in the absence of population a federal territory cannot be considered a public-law entity due to the lack of practical necessity to create a system of public authorities within its boundaries. In order to take into account in the formation of a uniform concept of federal territories the classification of their features is proposed. The author's concept of federal territories is formulated. Supporting the approach of the legislator to form the concept of federal territories in a separate federal law on the creation of a particular territory, it is proposed to fix the general concept of federal territories in the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

The article is based on the materials of a report presented by the author at the expert discussion within the framework of the scientific and practical conference "Personality in Management Systems" held at the RANEPA in March this year. The subject of the presented analysis is the problems of status, ideological and ideological orientations, professional and personal qualities and the inconsistency of their implementation in the practice of the practical actions of elite–leadership level subjects, taking into account the challenges and threats in the current extremely difficult and not always positive transformations. Special attention is paid to the analysis of qualitative characteristics of the legal, political and moral culture of domestic and Western elites. The sources, causes and forms of elite deviations are investigated. The author also touches upon the problem of the liberal democratic reassessment of values, the difficulties of forming the elite of modern Russian statehood – the elite of a sovereign, professionally mature, nationally oriented. Lessons from the past are taken into account, and relevant conclusions of a forward-looking nature are presented. Some of the provisions are staged, in some cases debatable, designed for further scientific analysis. Some proposals have also been formulated regarding the optimization of elite education mechanisms, maintaining the creative potential and social responsibility of the ruling elite stratum at the appropriate modern level.

Study examines the interplay between political motivations and the formulation of economic policy in the state decision-making process that initiated radical market reforms in Russia in October 1991. Employing the historical-genetic method, the research evaluates the role of external and internal factors that predetermined the choice of market transformation programs. The abstract-logical method is applied to identify distortions in the original reform blueprint following Yeltsin’s policy address to the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR on October 28, 1991.
The study demonstrates that by autumn 1991, the country stood on the brink of a systemic political crisis. This crisis unfolded under two interrelated circumstances: the collapse of the anti-Union coalition in the Russian parliament and the persistent influence of anti-Yeltsin forces at the regional level. In this context, holding regional, territorial, and republican elections risked institutionalizing state fragmentation and paralyzing central authority. The presidency faced the imperative to retain emergency powers for appointing regional administrative heads and secure a temporary moratorium on elections.
The response was a shift toward rapid market transformation. Key features of this decision included the announcement of price liberalization, a pro-Western orientation in the presidential program, and Yeltsin’s assumption of the premiership. While these measures enabled the launch of reforms and the suspension of regional elections through a consolidated act of government branches, subsequent developments—such as the collapse of consumer markets and the need to align with Western states and international organizations—rendered the original reform agenda unfeasible within the declared timeframe.