ISSN 2073-2643
En Ru
ISSN 2073-2643
Process connectivity of the industrial park environment: assessment concept and methodology

Process connectivity of the industrial park environment: assessment concept and methodology

Abstract

The article examines the problem of assessing the operating environment of industrial parks as a factor determining the effectiveness of their development. It demonstrates that existing approaches to the analysis of industrial parks are primarily focused on infrastructural and economic indicators, whereas the connectivity parameters of the environment that enable interaction between resident firms remain insufficiently explored. The purpose of the study is to develop a methodological toolkit for assessing the process connectivity of an industrial park’s environment. The paper proposes an integral index of process connectivity of the industrial park environment (IPSP), which allows for a quantitative assessment of the degree of integration of infrastructural, logistics, informational, and institutional elements of an industrial site. The index is tested on a sample of Russian industrial parks, and a typology of industrial sites is proposed according to the level of process connectivity of their environment. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the conceptualisation of the category of process connectivity of the industrial park environment and in the development of an integral tool for its quantitative assessment.


References

Обзор индустриальных парков России – 2024 // Ассоциация индустриальных парков России. 2024. URL: https://indparks.ru/materials/edition/.

Федеральный закон от 31.12.2014 № 488-ФЗ «О промышленной политике в Российской Федерации» (ред. от 28.12.2025).

Постановление Правительства РФ от 04.08.2015 № 794 «Об индустриальных парках и управляющих компаниях индустриальных парков».

Бурцева Т.А., Ахмадов А.Р. Метод оценки влияния создания новой промышленной инфраструктуры на промышленное и социально-экономическое развитие регионов // Экономика науки. 2022. Т. 8. № 1. С. 46–57. DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-1-46-57.

Корнейко О.В., Пестерева А.В., Зян Л. Критическая оценка действующих подходов к анализу эффективности российских особых экономических зон // Вектор науки Тольяттинского государственного университета. Серия: Экономика и управление. 2016. № 4. С. 49–54. DOI: 10.18323/2221-5689-2016-4-49-54.

Радыгина С.В. Технопарки, индустриальные парки и особые экономические зоны в качестве современного инструмента реновации промышленных площадок и создания условий для развития промышленного производства в России // Научные исследования и разработки. Экономика. 2021. Т. 9. № 4. С. 33–39. DOI: 10.12737/2587-9111-2021-9-4-33-39.

Растворцева С.Н., Блохина С.Д. Региональные агломерационные эффекты в экономике России // Проблемы развития территории. 2024. Т. 28. № 3. С. 10–28. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2024.3.131.2.

Beenstock M., Felsenstein D. Marshallian theory of regional agglomeration // Papers in Regional Science. 2010. Vol. 89. Is. 1. P. 155–172. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00253.x.

Boons F., Chertow M., Park J., Spekkink W., Shi H. Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics and the Problem of Equivalence: Proposal for a Comparative Framework // Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2017. Vol. 21. Is. 4. P. 938–952. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12468.

Boons F., Spekkink W., Jiao W. A Process Perspective on Industrial Symbiosis: Theory, Methodology, and Application // Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2014. Vol. 18. Is. 3. P. 341–355. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12116.

Chertow M.R. Industrial Symbiosis: Literature and Taxonomy // Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 313–337. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313.

Chertow M.R. «Uncovering» Industrial Symbiosis // Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2007. Vol. 11. Is. 1. P. 11–30. DOI: 10.1162/jiec.2007.1110.

Dai Y., Day S., Masi D., Gölgeci I. A synthesised framework of eco-industrial park transformation and stakeholder interaction // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022. Vol. 31. Is. 7. P. 3122–3151. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3067.

Ellison G., Glaeser E.L., Kerr W.R. What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns // American Economic Review. 2010. Vol. 100. No. 3. P. 1195–1213. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.1195.

Felício M., Amaral D.C., Esposto K., Gabarrell Durany X. Industrial symbiosis indicators to manage eco-industrial parks as dynamic systems // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 118. P. 54–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.031.

Felício M., Amaral D.C., Esposto K., Gabarrell Durany X. Sustainability indicators for the assessment of eco-industrial parks: classification and criteria for selection // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. Vol. 142. P. 2541–2556. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.193.

Lombardi D.R., Laybourn P. Redefining Industrial Symbiosis: Crossing Academic–Practitioner Boundaries // Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2012. Vol. 16. Is. 1. P. 28–37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00444.x.

Nathan M., Overman H. Agglomeration, clusters, and industrial policy // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2013. Vol. 29. Is. 2. P. 383–404. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grt019.

Porter M.E. Local Clusters in a Global Economy // Economic Development Quarterly. 2000. Vol. 14. Is. 1. P. 15–34. DOI: 10.1177/089124240001400105.

Pushkarev A., Gainetdinova A., Davidson N., Sokolova E. The impact of special economic zones on industrial enterprises' productivity in Russia // Post-Communist Economies. 2024. Vol. 36, Is. 7. P. 801–830. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2024.2376984.

Verbeke A., Greidanus N.S. The end of the opportunism vs trust debate: Bounded reliability as a new envelope concept in research on MNE governance // Journal of International Business Studies. 2009. Vol. 40. Is. 9. P. 1471–1495. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2009.44.

Wang H., Shen M., Song Y., Philibert S. Transaction cost theory: past progress, current challenges, and suggestions for the future // Academy of Management Annals. 2021. Vol. 15. Is. 1. P. 111–150. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2019.0051.

Zhang Y., Zheng H., Shi H., Yu X., Liu G., Su M., Li Y., Chai Y. Network analysis of eight industrial symbiosis systems // Frontiers of Earth Science. 2016. Vol. 10. Is. 2. P. 352–365. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-015-0520-9.

Zhang H., Li Y., Wang J. Eco-industrial parks construction and industrial chain resilience: Evidence from Chinese cities // Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 2025. Vol. 7. Article 1663273. DOI: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1663273.

Yuan Y., Li X., Zhou D., Zhang S. Promote the decarbonization pathways of eco-industrial parks: A scenario-based assessment for national demonstration parks in China // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024. Vol. 435. Article 140241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140241.

Lazarenko D.O. State support for enterprises processing construction waste in the context of eco-industrial park development // Economic and Environmental Studies. 2024. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 45–60. DOI: 10.17512/ees.2024.1.3.

Södergren B., Palm J. Governing industrial and urban symbiosis: Internal and external strategies of local authorities // Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2025. (ahead of print). DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13321.

Daddi T., Nucci B., Iraldo F. Circular economy: A study of eco-industrial park governance // Journal of Governance and Regulation. 2023. Vol. 14. Is. 2 (Special Issue). P. 120–132. DOI: 10.22495/jgrv14i2siart9.

PDF

Received: 03/08/2026

Keywords: industrial park, industrial infrastructure, production linkages, process connectivity, industrial park efficiency, integral index.

  • To cite this article:
Issue 2, 2026