ISSN 2073-2643
En Ru
ISSN 2073-2643
The devil is in the details: Why SME finance support schemes derail?

The devil is in the details: Why SME finance support schemes derail?

Abstract

Based on a review of the research literature, the article identifies and analyzes the “instrumental failures” of four key financial support measures for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – guarantees, concessional loans, subsidies, and grants. It introduces the concept of an “instrumental failure” and develops a typology of conditions that drive government intervention off course: excessive or insufficient guarantee coverage, undifferentiated fees, overly low concessional rates, disproportionate subsidies and grants, a high share of refinancing, and repeated (“serial”) beneficiaries. The study’s practical significance lies in the specific remedies it proposes for each failure —ranging from an optimal guarantee-coverage band of 50–80 percent to floating fees and quotas for smaller firms —thereby providing a foundation for more precisely calibrated SME-support programs and greater efficiency in public spending.



References

Altavilla C., Ellul A., Pagano M., Polo A., Vlassopoulos T. Loan Guarantees, Bank Lending and Credit Risk Reallocation // ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance. 2023. Working Paper No. 944/2023.

Autor D., Cho D., Crane L.D., Goldar M., Lutz B., Montes J.K., Peterman W.B., Ratner D.D., Vallenaz V. D., Yildirmaz A. The $800 billion paycheck protection program: where did the money go and why did it go there? // Working Paper 29669. 2022. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Beenstock M. Evaluating Subsidized Credit Policy in Kazakhstan with SME and Spatial Panel Data: First- and Second-Best Policy // Comparative Economic Studies. 2025. P.1-29.

Benavente J.M., Galetovic A., Sanhueza R. FOGAPE: An economic analysis // Serie Documentos de Trabajo No. 222. Universidad de Chille. 2006.

Berger A.N., Udell G.F. A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance// Journal of Banking and Finance. 2006. Vol. 20. Is.11. P. 2945-2966.

Brenninkmeijer A., Debets R., Sweeney J., Vazquez Rivera J.A., Garrido-Lestache Angulo A., Codd W., Montorio M. The SME Instrument in action: an effective and innovative programme facing challenges // European Court of Auditors Special Report. 2020. No. 2. 67 p.

Bronzini R., De Blasio G. Evaluating the impact of investment incentives: The case of Italy's Law 488/1992 //Journal of urban Economics. 2006. Vol. 60. Is. 2. P.327-349.

Das A. An Efficacy Assessment of Pandemic Driven Business Support Initiative // INM433 Visual Analytics. 2021. City University, London, UK.

Douette A., Lesaffre D., Siebeke R. SMEs Credit Guarantee Schemes in Developing and Emerging Economies: Reflections, Setting-up Principles, Quality Standards. GIZ.2014. 142 c.

Goffe V., Hammersley J., Rustom E. Best Practices in the Operation of Partial Credit Guarantee Schemes. Word Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA. 2021. 27 c.

Gozzi J.C., Schmukler S. Public Credit Guarantees and Access to Finance // Working Paper No. 1112. 2016. Warwick Economics Research Paper Series.

Grimaldi D., Ornelas J.R.H. Do Firms Need Cheaper Credit to Grow? investigating the effectiveness of subsidized earmarked loans // Working Paper Series 599. 2024. Banco Cental Do Brasil.

Hancké B., Van Overbeke T., Voss D. Similar but different? Comparing economic policy responses to the Corona Crisis in the UK and Germany // LEQS Paper No. 165/2020. 2021. London School of Economics.

Hoshi T., Kawaguchi D., Ueda K. Zombies, again? The COVID-19 business support programs in Japan // Journal of Banking and Finance. 2023. Vol. 147. P.106-121.

Kayo E.K., da Silva W.E., Martelanc R. The two faces of subsidized loans// Finance Research Letters. 2023. Vol. 56. P. 104-149.

László A. Impact of the Funding for Growth Scheme on the Hungarian economy // Financial and Economic Review. 2016. Vol. 15. Is. 4. P. 65–87.

Link A. N., Swann C. A. SBIR mills and the US Department of Defense // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2024. Vol. 49. P. 2306-2335.

Ono T. How to Address Unique Risks in Agriculture Credit Guarantee Schemes: Lessons Learned from Credit Guarantees for Agriculture. Word Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA. 2021. 42 c.

Orlenas J.R.H., Pedraza A., Ruiz-Ortega C., Silva T. Market Power and the Transmission of Loan Subsidies // The Review of Corporate Finance Studies.2024. Vol. 13. Is. 4. P. 931-965.

Saito K., Tsuruta D. Information asymmetry in small and medium enterprise credit guarantee schemes: evidence from Japan // Applied Economics. 2018. Vol. 50. Is. 22. 2469-2485.

Srhoj S., Lapinski M., Walde J. Impact evaluation of business development grants on SME performance //Small Business Economics. 2021. Vol. 57. P.1285-1301.

Taghizadeh-Hesary F., Yoshino N., Fukuda L. A model for calculating optimal credit guarantee fee for small and medium-sized enterprises //Economic Modelling. 2021. Vol. 95. P. 361-373.

Uesugi I., Sakai K., Yamashiro G.M. The effectiveness of public credit guarantees in the Japanese loan market // Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 2010.Vol. 24. Is. 4. 457-480.

Wallsten S.J. The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program // The RAND Journal of Economics. 2000. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P.82-100.

Zúñiga‐Vicente J. Á., Alonso-Borrego C., Forcadell F.J., Galán J.I. Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: a survey // Journal of economic surveys. 2014. Vol. 28. Is.1. P.36-67.

PDF

Received: 06/14/2025

Keywords: SME financial support; concessional loans; credit guarantee; subsidies; grants; instrument failure

  • To cite this article:
Issue 3, 2025